On May 11, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two important religious liberty cases, Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru and St. James School v. Biel. Both of these cases ask the Court to clarify the proper scope of a doctrine called the “ministerial exception.”
What is the ministerial exception? And what do spiritual entrepreneurs need to know to claim the protection of this legal doctrine?
The ministerial exception—which derives from the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution—protects the right of religious organizations to decide who their “ministers” will be, thereby shielding them from liability under state and federal employment discrimination laws in connection with the hiring and firing of employees who fall within the exception. In other words, the ministerial exception gives religious organizations autonomy to hire and fire key religious personnel and protects them from employment discrimination claims on the basis of religion, race, sex, disability, age, etc., in connection with those decisions.
As its name suggests, the ministerial exception covers only those employment decisions affecting “ministers.” In general, whether a particular employment position qualifies as ministerial depends on: (1) the employee’s formal title; (2) the substance reflected in that title; (3) the employee’s use of that title; and (4) the important religious functions the employee performs.
While it might be tempting for a Catholic non-profit to designate all employees as ministers in order to shield itself from employment discrimination liability, merely declaring that an employee is a minister is not enough to bring that employment position within the protection of the ministerial exception. Instead, Catholic non-profits should undertake an audit to determine which of their employees, if any, qualify as ministers.
Read more about the history of the ministerial exception, the important protections it provides for Catholic organizations, and how to conduct a ministerial exception audit in my recent white paper, The Ministerial Exception: How Catholic Non-Profits Can Safeguard Their Right to Choose Their Own Leaders.
The views and opinions set forth herein are the personal views or opinions of the author; they do not necessarily reflect views or opinions of the law firm with which she is associated.
Kaytlin Roholt Lane is an associate in Jones Day’s Washington, D.C. office, where she represents clients at critical stages of high-stakes regulatory and constitutional litigation. As part of her practice, Kaytlin has represented clients seeking to vindicate their religious liberty rights, including in several matters before the U.S. Supreme Court. In addition to her career in private practice, Kaytlin has clerked for federal judges at the trial and appellate levels and served as Special Counsel to the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee for the Nomination of Justice Neil M. Gorsuch to the United States Supreme Court. Kaytlin earned her Juris Doctor from the University of Pennsylvania School of Law and her B.A., summa cum laude, in English Literature and Theology and Religious Studies from the University of Scranton. She also holds a Master of Bioethics from the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine. Kaytlin currently serves as the President of the Federalist Society’s D.C. Young Lawyers Chapter and President Emeritus of the Thomas More Society of America. Kaytlin and her husband live in Old Town Alexandria, Virginia.
May 27, 2022 | While the first line of protection from liability is exercising best practices, holding adequate insurance is essential for any organization as a fail-safe when human error occurs.
May 16, 2022 | Compared to the more common fiduciary duties of care and loyalty, the duty of obedience to mission is often forgotten. Unlike directors in the for-profit sector who seek to maximize profit for shareholders, non-profit directors must consider their organizational purposes and mission statements when making decisions.
May 11, 2022 | The Parable of the Talents is often referenced when the topic of investing arises. The story aims to teach us that talents (our money, resources, tools, or gifts) are to be placed out in the world and put into action where they can benefit others, grow, and then come back multiplied. The principle applies to faith-based nonprofits, as well as individuals and for-profit businesses. When a faith-based organization finds itself with extra cash, the organization should consider whether investing these extra funds prudently would be in the organization’s best interest.