The name of NLI’s blog, And God’s First, is inspired by St. Thomas More, who was convicted of treason and executed by Henry VIII for refusing to take the Oath of Supremacy. More’s witness has inspired people of faith for many centuries, as he stood firmly for the rights of conscience despite pressure from the King.

“On his way to the Tower one of his daughters, named Margaret, pushed through the archers and guards, and held him in her embrace some time without being able to speak. Afterwards More, asking leave of the archers, bade her have patience, for it was God's will, and she had long known the secret of his heart. After going 10 or 12 steps she returned and embraced him again, to which he said nothing, except to bid her pray to God for his soul; and this without tears or change of color. On the Tuesday following he was beheaded in the open space in front of the Tower. A little before his death he asked those present to pray to God for him and he would do the same for them [in the other world.] He then be sought them earnestly to pray to God to give the King good counsel, protesting that he died his faithful servant, and God's first."

The Paris Newsletter Account of More’s Trial and Execution,
August 4, 1535

Napa Legal Files Amicus Brief at the US Supreme Court to Promote Religious Liberty

On April 27, Napa Legal joined the Manhattan Institute in filing an amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in the important case of Missionaries of Saint John the Baptist v. Frederic. Beyond the facts themselves, there are several concerning legal implications in this decision. In particular, Napa Legal took interest in the Kentucky Supreme Court’s rejection of the religious organization’s Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) claim.

Read

SCOTUS Decides Major Free Speech Case and Upholds Christian Therapists’ Constitutional Rights

In Chiles v. Salazar, the Supreme Court recently held that Colorado’s law banning “conversion therapy” unconstitutionally regulates speech based on viewpoint as applied to therapists that engage in talk therapy. The Court found that Colorado’s law constituted viewpoint discrimination. The law allows therapists to affirm a patient's gender dysphoria or sexual confusion but prevents them from approaching these issues in other ways that contradict the state-mandated viewpoint adopted in Colorado.

Read

On the Merits of the Ten Commandments: Religion and Public Education

The Fifth Circuit, in Roake v. Brumley, recently allowed Louisiana to proceed with placing the Ten Commandments in classrooms. Around the same time in Stinson v. Fayetteville School District, Judge Brooks of the Western District of Arkansas issued a permanent injunction against a similar Arkansas law. According to the Stinson opinion, the mere display of the Ten Commandments is coercive, even though the law does not require any sort of teaching on them.

Read

The Good Counselor in the Prophet Isaiah

In his vision of the standard of leadership, Isaiah highlights the wisdom, justice, righteousness, and enduring peace of the “Good Counselor” (Pele Yo‘etz, פֶּלֶא יוֹעֵץ). Jewish and Christian traditions differ in their interpretations of Isaiah’s prophecy, but both perspectives provide us guidance as attorneys to emulate divine standards of moral leadership, wise counsel, and devotion to justice.

Read

How the Law Upholds Public Display of the Ten Commandments - Judge Ho on the Merits of Roake v. Brumley

The First Congress stated in the Northwest Ordinance of 1789 that religion was vital to the happiness of mankind and that, therefore, religious education in schools should always be encouraged, not discouraged. Therefore, the idea that any law requiring the displaying of the Ten Commandments is in violation of the Constitution simply does not square with the American tradition. While the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed a lawsuit against Louisiana's law requiring public schools to post the Ten Commandments on ripeness, the court should have upheld the law on the merits instead.

Read

Is a School Choice Revolution Coming?

Contained in the One Big Beautiful Bill, enacted July 2025, is a provision that was previously called the Educational Choice for Children Act. This provision establishes a federal tax credit scholarship program effective January 1, 2027. The new program is not only a win for taxpayers; nonprofit schools will have doors opened for students who previously may have been out of reach.

Read

More from And God's First