The name of NLI’s blog, And God’s First, is inspired by St. Thomas More, who was convicted of treason and executed by Henry VIII for refusing to take the Oath of Supremacy. More’s witness has inspired people of faith for many centuries, as he stood firmly for the rights of conscience despite pressure from the King.

“On his way to the Tower one of his daughters, named Margaret, pushed through the archers and guards, and held him in her embrace some time without being able to speak. Afterwards More, asking leave of the archers, bade her have patience, for it was God's will, and she had long known the secret of his heart. After going 10 or 12 steps she returned and embraced him again, to which he said nothing, except to bid her pray to God for his soul; and this without tears or change of color. On the Tuesday following he was beheaded in the open space in front of the Tower. A little before his death he asked those present to pray to God for him and he would do the same for them [in the other world.] He then be sought them earnestly to pray to God to give the King good counsel, protesting that he died his faithful servant, and God's first."

The Paris Newsletter Account of More’s Trial and Execution,
August 4, 1535

Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin Applies the Establishment Clause to Prevent Religious Discrimination

Proponents of religious liberty will be quick to celebrate the US Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in the recent Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin case, and for good reason. At face value, the Court’s ruling affirmed that the faith-based nonprofit was improperly excluded from a religious exemption from a Wisconsin tax. However, the opinion provides a much greater victory for faith and freedom by continuing to build an Establishment Clause jurisprudence that supports rather than constricts the free exercise of religion.

Read

What Do Faith-Based Nonprofits Need to Know About State Employment Discrimination Laws?

Faith-based organizations should be free to exercise their religion. This freedom must include the ability to model a community of faith through the recruitment, hiring, and retention of employees committed to living in accordance with the organization’s beliefs. The legal roots of this freedom are derived from the First Amendment, especially the Ministerial Exception, which prevents the government from interfering with a religious organization’s selection of ministers. But beyond the Ministerial Exception, most employment protections for faith-based nonprofits come from state law.

Read

Washington Bishops Push Back Against Discriminatory Legislation

On May 2, 2025, Washington Governor Robert Ferguson signed S. 5375 into law, which mandates that clergy are mandated reporters for child abuse incidents, even when the information the clergy members obtain comes through a privileged communication, such as a sacramental Confession. While the legislation may seem well intentioned, it targets the religious freedom of members of the clergy, which is a particular problem for priests who hear confessions.

Read

Five Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s decision in St. Isidore v. Drummond

On May 22, the US Supreme Court released its opinion in St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Drummond. The Court took up the case to address important questions impacting the future of religious liberty and education freedom.

Read

What Are Public Programming Laws and Why Do They Matter?

States protect civil rights by requiring places of public accommodation to “serve all comers” without respect to certain protected characteristics. In theory, these should be good laws that simply prevent places that offer public accommodations (such as restaurants, coffee shops, retail stores, etc.) from refusing to serve customers based on inherent characteristics like race or ethnicity. However, recently, laws have been enacted that go much further, imposing restrictions on the religious freedom of nonprofits that serve the public.

Read

In Mahmoud, Parents Must be Recognized as the Primary Formators of Their Children

Last month, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Mahmoud v. Taylor. Mahmoud addresses a critical question: whether parents of children attending public schools have the right to opt their children out of instruction on gender and sexuality pursuant to the parents’ religious and parental rights.

Read

More from And God's First